The Supreme Court determined the jurisdiction of the dispute between the company and its founder. Alexander Baev 's comment for "Pravo.ru"

The founder borrowed money from his company, but never received it back. The funds were returned in the court of general jurisdiction, but the cassation reversed the decision and indicated that the dispute had to be resolved in the arbitration court since it was related to commercial activities. The Supreme Court was of a different opinion. As lawyers say, courts are often mistaken as to jurisdiction because the criteria are blurred. But this is fraught with the delay of the proceedings. To avoid this, explanations of the Supreme Court may be useful.

Alexander Baev's comment for "Pravo.ru"